Recently, on social media, an NLP Practitioner asked a question about a client who reported having a phobia, and with whom he used the NLP Fast Phobia Cure, which may have partly worked, but it came back a few days later?
NLP Rapport - Pacing and Leading - NLP Chat Transcript
IRC Chat Pages [ Back to Chat Index Page ]
IRC Chat Log, February 23, 1998
PACING & LEADING | |
| Jonathan | Hi folks -- welcome to the event! How many people haven't been present here at a previous chat? |
| Stygian, ZeroHero, Howard | me |
| sigroggy | I've been at one |
| Jonathan | Well basically we follow a varying format here! I lead a bit, see where people wanna go, and then we go there. Pacing & Leading, unlike my chat on the Meta Model (to be found elsewhere on the chatlog pages) is a bit more open-ended! We can take it wherever we want to go! |
| Stefan | Been at about one and a half previous. |
| Jonathan | So I thought I'd start by asking people what they think its actually for, and when they might want to use it, and when they think they're already using pacing & leading? |
| Stygian | I think it's for congruently directing a person's thoughts |
| Jonathan | Anyone else? Well, alright, I'll keep going ;) |
| Grendie | I think it's used in developing rapport and directiong people in certing directions.. |
| Stefan | I believe one important reason for pacing is that it makes further communication smoother. Both of you move along in the same direction and rate at the beginning... |
| Jonathan | Oh, those are all good ideas... What percentage of the time when you're with other people are you pacing & leading? |
| Grendie | I'd say..most if not all.. it's unconcious... |
| Jonathan | ;) Grendie's been through this before ;) |
| Grendie | you'd think ;) |
| Jonathan | Yes, I'd say so... I believe we're always communicating, verbally or nonverbally, when we're in the presence of other people. And many of us would like to gain deeper rapport with others, and influence others more effectively, wouldn't we? |
| Grendie | I know I would... |
| Jonathan | But all that assumes that this only operates between people... what about pacing & leading yourself? Internally? Can you pace & lead yourself? With all of these questions out in the open, lets give some definitions to these words... |
| Stygian | pace is to say what's true, leading is to go with that and add something new |
| Jonathan | I think PACING, with respect to other people is when you choose one or more elements of that person's experience to match, mirror, respond to, whatever, in the same fashion as that person is experiencing it. By pacing, your basic intent can be to VALIDATE their experience. If you think about it in those terms... you can find many many ways to apply the principles of pacing across all kinds of circumstances! |
| Howard | Can be? |
| Jonathan | So we VALIDATE their experience in many different ways, whether verbally or nonverbally, whether through conceptual means or through sensory specific ways. Can be = IS ;) If you can pace any 1 or more elements of their experience, and if you can do it well, or even better, if you can do it completely... with total accuracy, you're increasingly likely to be in rapport with that person. {Phoenix Morgan rolls in} Hiya Phoenix! We're just getting rolling here with PACING already defined... Now... that you've got a framework for PACING people... |
| Stygian | hi sargy come join our seminar |
| Jonathan | You have an opportunity to influence them in a way that takes their perception in another direction. But before you start leading, if you want to do this with an NLP perspective, i.e., with something in mind... you have to recognize when you're pacing, recognize when you want to start leading, and then, take a BRIEF MOMENT, and JUST STOP, THINK ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON, and ask yourself what's your outcome? |
| Howard | OK, so as a beginner which do I strive for, mechanical (breathing, posture, etc) or emotional? |
| Jonathan | What's the POINT of leading, and once you can ask that, and get an answer, then you can lead somewhere. Leading for the sake of leading ain't worth it! |
| Stefan | Or, you are in a better position to pace further, find out more about where the're currently at. |
| Jonathan | Definitely. But we don't do that much pacing if it isn't required ;) Not anymore, anyway... |
| Stefan | ;-) |
| ZeroHero | so when you are pacing you are agreeing, and then when u lead, they agree with that? |
| Jonathan | That may be something suggested by other NLP approaches, but with the Society of NLP we suggest a different approach.. ;) ADMIN interrupt -- some people don't see the chat title in the titlebar.... for those who don't, we're discussing NLP, PACING AND LEADING !!! OK back to topic! Well I'd say it differently, perhaps, Zero... |
| Stygian | So as you're sitting in your chair, looking at your computer, have you ever wondered how you can have certain umm...thoughts... |
| Jonathan | when I'm pacing I'm validating their experience which is likely to make them VERY comfortable with me (depends on if I'm pacing something nice) |
| ZeroHero | ok |
| Jonathan | And if I want to help them into a better state, or influence them in some other way, I may decide to lead somehow. And leading is like moving in a direction away from where they're at... and they may just follow along! Right Stygian, you can lead with artfully vague suggestions that easily pace and lead at the same time. So Leading is useful for countless purposes. Some say the purpose of all communication is influence. I'm not sure I agree with that as a universal, but there is *some* truth to that. Pacing & Leading as a process is something NLP studied for a long long time, and extracted forms of it for just about all kinds of communication between people, and between the "parts" of your unconscious... mind... ;) For all kinds of purposes too. But guess what. Since NLP is more about modelling excellence than it is about innovation in and of itself, Pacing & Leading is NOTHING NEW! People have been pacing and leading since time immemorial, have they not? |
| Stygian | What did Bandler once say about "Leading... f*** pacing" or something of that sort at a recent seminar you went to? What was that about? |
| Jonathan | Just, in most cases, that most people are doing it very inneffectively. We'll get to that Stygian! |
| Stygian | woohoo! |
| Jonathan | So the principle behind the mechanism of "pace & lead" is that leading is influencing, which people may or may not react to and may or may not follow along with! Make sense? (y/n) |
| ZeroHero | yes |
| Jonathan | So If you could lead right from the start, and have them follow along, would there be any need for pacing? I suggest not... |
| SimonH | it depends how people are following |
| Jonathan | True Simon! Well, in practice, we find that it helps to have rapport. OK, as NLP'ers we know how to do that! |
| Stygian | Can't you lead from the start if you have good enough rapport? |
| Jonathan | So we go to the Rapport process and we gain rapport. And that can be done VERY fast. So we gain rapport, we do checks & all that and then when we think we have some rapport, should we keep pacing longer? Some trainers might say yes. I'd say, no, start leading. See if they follow. If they follow, then you know you're leading and THEY'RE pacing you. |
| SimonH | agreed |
| Jonathan | If not, pace a little longer and regain rapport. Make sense everyone? (y/n) This is what's behind what Styg was talking about with respect to Richard's comment about pacing. |
| sigroggy | Y |
| Jonathan | In the old days of NLP, they used to teach... PACE PACE PACE LEAD... then.... PACE PACE LEAD LEAD ... then ... PACE LEAD LEAD LEAD ... then all leads. |
| Stygian | Is that obsolete thinking? |
| Jonathan | The idea being, lets do a heck of a lot of pacing, waste some time, do some tests, then eventually we'll do a little leading. Its not that its obsolete since that process still works! |
| ZeroHero | so basically only pace when necessary |
| Jonathan | Its that its not flexible, and it doesn't take into account the sheer power of congruent personalities, and the likelihood that people will just follow along with outlandishness and slightly (not rudely) outrageous people! Yes, Zero! Only pace when necessary. Actually, sometimes it helps to pace a twinge up front, but not for long, and the moment you KNOW you have rapport, leave the pacing behind. |
| SimonH | it depends on outcomes |
| Jonathan | If you're really powerful with people (for whatever reason), just LEAD, and see if any pacing is necessary at all! So Phoenix -- what are your thoughts on PACING & LEADING? |
| Howard | I'm slightly confused. Is this outlandish, outrageous and powerful personality... charisma? |
| Jonathan | Yes of course! And a singularity of purpose. Congruity. Most people I've ever met are a jumble of conflicting inner voices, conflicting body language, etc. Conflicting feelings, too, right? |
| Howard | You betcha. |
| Jonathan | When people meet with other people who either don't have those... or who have a lot less of the conflicting parts, there is an internal response in incongruent people... that they don't really know how to describe... one which responds to congruent people with a resonance, an automatic response that just says inside their minds.... "oooooooooh this is one really magnetic person" -- or something along those lines! It doesn't have to be auditory -- it could be anything, really. But incongruity can be both internally and externally created, and is NATURALLY drawn to external or internal congruity because of the comfort that can be connected with congruity. Incongruity can be UNcomfortable! So I make sure that when I wish to lead, I eliminate as much incongruity as I can from my intent in those situations. Granted as a member of the human race I'm just as prone to the initiation of incongruent feelings and behavior as anyone else. What my training provides *me* (just my opinion here) is an increased ability to recognize my own incongruity either as its happening or after its already happening, which lets me DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. I'd be interested in hearing other opinions along these same lines from all of you -- regardless of your NLP background! |
| SimonH | My guess is that your leading has a lot of pacing in it - in that you are watching for reactions |
| Howard | I would love to hear whether others have the same experience |
| Jonathan | Definitely, Simon! Lots of checkpoints built into my leading processes just thru Sensory Acuity! WHen people are learning, however, it can be useful to separate the skills out consciously (at least at first). Start by learning how to pace completely then learn how to do a little leading, and check for responsiveness and responses. When you have the basic processes of pacing and of leading down at a simple level, you can begin to combine them in interesting ways... thats when you start learning PPPP -> PPPL -> PPLL -> PLLL -> LLLL |
| Howard | Pacing, leading, then integrating other skills - personal congruency |
| Jonathan | Definitely! You know, I was teaching a training last month (weekend 2 of a prac training actually) when some advanced rapport skills came into discussion. And we were there during a break, and 4 of the students were sitting in front of me, and all were within my field of view. One of them asked, how do you get rapport with a group? I thought... what an opportunity... to just demonstrate! They had all been thru some extensive sensory acuity exercises by then, so... |
| Stefan | Pace a little aspect of every member, here and there? |
| Jonathan | I just picked up one's breathing, one's blink rate, one's posture, and one's facial expression. Within about a minute any variations in getting them all almost vanished, and it was like there was this mutual sensation or feeling of being connected up. It was quite profound. |
| sabren | Is this the how to be a composit man seminar? :) NLP frankenstein. :) |
| Jonathan | They all started laughing and nodding at the same rate -- it was really weird. And we talked about it afterwards. That was all just pacing, of course... ;) |
| Stefan | but that takes some practice to pace like that really well, right? |
| Jonathan | Some practice, sure! But you ALREADY do it with people you have natural rapport with, don't you? |
| ZeroHero | Can one pace to heart beat? |
| Jonathan | Zero, how surprised would you be to find that you could? |
| MetaMan | If you enter the appropriate "state" you can pace any behavior of another |
| Jonathan | How surprised would you be to find that you can actually consciously see the heartbeat, in most people, at the base of the neck! |
| ZeroHero | not very =) |
| Stefan | Yes, but not very conciously. Doing that as well would be neat. |
| Jonathan | And once you learn how to create the bio-feedback loop in your own body, in just the right states, as Phoenix (Meta-Man) mentioned... then it all happens quite easily. |
| MetaMan | Knowing how and when to shift your state is very important to pacing and leading as is the root belief of BEHAVIORAL FLEXIBILTY |
| Jonathan | OOoooh great point -- see his point folks? Carry that torch a bit further plz! |
| MetaMan | hmmm, I'll carrying it to, ask yourself HOW CURIOUS CAN YOU BE and then Double that. Good point to start to entering OTC rapport with another! Yoga and breathing excerices and toning are good tools to being using often to increase flexibilty |
| Jonathan | Yes, really good tools, along with tai chi! Whenever I walk up to someone, I want to already be asking myself 2 things.... Where are they now? AND, where do I want to go, because with those two questions answered, and ONLY after they've been answered... can I actually begin to create a plan for bridging the present into the desired future state. |
| MetaMan | yes, anything that uses as many aspects and then some of yourself should be done often and expanded upon. If you are used to be flexible and fluid then it is easier to do it when you need it. stretch yourself 3x more than life and life is a breeze |
THE PURPOSE OF PACING AND LEADING | |
| Jonathan | We've covered definitions, and the purpose of each, and the structure of how they used to be taught vs how they're taught now... and we've discussed a couple of examples as to how to begin to use one or the other more flexibly... And at a high-level, there's little to say about it other than (thanks to Phoenix for the choice of words here) observe act & observe more! But when you're learning this at a conscious process level, there's always a lot more to it! So lets stop, take stock of what we've discussed, and entertain some questions for a while. Then we can go over a couple of more examples and close down the event! JOIN IN! Ask questions now! (those of you there, awake ;) and just unsure of what to ask -- say Y) |
| Howard, ZeroHero | Yes. |
| SimonH | So how do you handle the situation where the leader gets impatient |
| Jonathan | Can you provide a little more context, Simon? |
| SimonH | OK; Let's suppose a business leader wants to move his company in a certain direction and no-one goes along with it |
| Jonathan | ahh, sounds like he didn't get buy-in to his plans; sounds like he didn't pace anyone very effectively |
| SimonH | Sure and there comes a point when leading is the only game in town |
| Jonathan | because although you don't need to pace to lead effectively, if you notice at any time that you're not able to lead, instead of trying to lead more from the same basic position, I'd want to go back and pace some more. |
| Howard | How can you lead if no one is following !?! |
| Jonathan | When LEADING is the only game in town, that tells me that that is the PERFECT time to do a lot of pacing -- since its then, at that point, the one thing no one else is doing! Agreed, Howard! So you lead, check, if you have them pacing you, you can keep leading, and if not then you drop back a little and pace for longer! |
| SimonH | which says to me that the well-formed outcome for the leader is to allow time for that to happen |
| Jonathan | Does all that make sense or are the other better views on this (I never assume I have the better answer than whats out there!) ? One well-formed outcome, Simon, certainly! |
| Howard | Makes sense, often leaders fall out of step because they fall out of touch. And, you can't pace when you're not in touch. |
| Jonathan | right! |
| Howard | Then, consciously pacing means consciously getting back in touch. |
| Jonathan | Well, shall we continue with a few other examples? Or close things down? |
| Howard | One other comment please.... As a beginner, pacing is learning excercise in sensory acuity. Or, so I find. |
| Jonathan | yes absolutely |
| MetaMan | Give that man an NLP cookie! |
| Jonathan | Increased sensory acuity is one of the results those kinds of exercises produce! |
| MetaMan | Richard would be proud of your granma |
| Howard | Which is why pacing is a 'fundamental' nlp skill. |
| Jonathan | OK, no question. PACING is very useful! I teach it at my trainings! |
| MetaMan | Sensory acuity is even more a primary skill of that skill |
| Jonathan | AND! or BUT! (whichever you choose) -- More important than pacing, or leading, or any conscious understanding of the things I teach, in my opinion, is behavioral flexibility! |
| Stefan | And once you have rapport, you can also try out more NLP Techniques to the poor unsuspecting people. |
| sigroggy | Do you utilize time distortion to increase your sensory acuity so you can pace more effectively? I figure if I could speed myself up enought i would have more than enough free cycles to spend on pacing... |
| Jonathan | Goodness what a question sigroggy! hehheh You wouldn't need to after doing a lot of those exercises within a longer training, sig! |
| Stefan | Are Stever and Anthony Robbins related? |
| Jonathan | I believe they're unrelated, Stefan. ;) They don't look at all alike! His site is the NLP & DHE™ General Information Server. Major site. Alright folks -- thanks for joining us tonight for Pacing & Leading... I'm getting tired myself, the subject at a chat level doesn't lend itself to more than this kind of discussion, and I hope you found it enlightening. |
| Howard | Thanks, Jonathan, for hosting! |
| Jonathan | As you move forward with the above information, think about how do you check for rapport with your own leads... i.e., how do they follow and how can you tell? At some level, you're going to start noticing this around you all the time! Goodnight, everyone! |
IRC CHAT OVER! | |
[ Back to Top ] [ Back to Chat Index Page ]
Inbox Insights
- Knowledge Engineering (& Belief Craft) have evolved, into GeniusMapping™
- As of September 2020, we're in the process of moving from Tampa, Florida, to the Youngstown Ohio area. Currently, during the Coronavirus era, we're mostly focusing on Zoom-based Coaching, and aligning resources to run online courses.
- How "Civil Engineering" totally reframes the word "Stress," redefines the phrase "Stress Management," and leads us to embrace Stress!
- Many NLP Practitioners are more sloppy with their thinking patterns, than they'd like to admit, or... would even notice.
- Watch NLP Co-Founder Richard Bandler use NLP to eliminate Michael Strahan's phobic response to snakes -- in minutes (with Kelly Ripa bringing over a BIG snake at the end to test Michael's response). Spoiler alert: It worked ridiculously well.
- No matter what skill you want to learn, no matter what fears or concerns or hesitation you may have, there are and will always be a wide range of approaches, to learning that skill. It's important to keep that in mind when making learning choices.
- Many more famous people have been trained in Ericksonian (indirect) Hypnosis and NLP than you might guess. There are certainly far more who have strong interests here than have publically admitted so.
- On January 1, 2015, Jonathan Altfeld and 20 other co-authors released a digital book entitled "Creating Business Growth."
- What are the Four Stages of Learning?
- Mark HenryCertified Hypnotherapist, Baton Rouge, LABought Video : “Building Hypnotic Rapport”
Jonathan's skill builders DVDs are incredible. Learn about building hypnotic rapport by pacing and leading others breathing patterns. I synchronized my breathing with several attractive women at coffee shops and malls in the last month. Each turned their bodies toward me while I sat across a room. They gazed at me for several seconds. I felt that I connected with them on an unconscious level. I later spoke with them and were amazed at their friendliness to a complete stranger.
2005 - Bob DillonSeminar Leader, VermontAttended Course : Speaking Ingeniously
No matter where you perceive your skill level, there is always more. Jonathan not only cuts diamonds, he polishes them, and adds more facets."
2002 - Ted VanderNootCognitrix, London, UKAttended Course : Belief Craft MP3 Set
"Your presentation of AI & Knowledge Engineering & how computer software systems can learn & decide was quite interesting. But using these models to then explore modelling in the NLP context was mind-blowing! It was really cool how well we were tracking beliefs by only the second day. [...] Not only could we track beliefs & language patterns "on the fly" but we could unravel their interconnections & their interactions conversationally. I thoroughly recommend your course to anyone who wants to improve their skills at tracking language patterns & modelling."
http://www.cognitrix.com/2005 - Elaine ChristakosFinancial Coach, Kelowna, BCAttended Course : Linguistic Wizardry
Jonathan is a superb trainer and communicator. I am thrilled to have participated in his recent Seattle Linguistic Wizardry workshop. Jonathan has a way of transferring knowledge with such ease as to include everyone - regardless of prior training or NLP experience. I was in awe watching how Jonathan managed to reach everyone in a different way - while constantly keeping the entire group engaged. I've now got a renewed excitement for practicing my NLP skills, and am more eager than ever to keep it working for me. Although I thought my coaching calls were great prior to attending LW, soon after my training - I found my calls to be more fluid and effective. The words seemed to flow much easier and my use of embedded commands are more natural and useful. I also am better able to focus my attention on understanding the style of my clients patterns - without losing focus on the content of what I'm teaching. It has all been such a natural process that I'm eager to see where it will be most effective next.
2007 - G.A.Sydney, AustraliaBought Audio : Finding Your Irresistible Voice
After reviewing your CDs I started realising how applicable it was in creating a new improved voice range. I realised that with very little effort people were listening attentively to me, even in crowded places and in places where machinery is constantly running. My workmates noticed it too, dropping comments as to how 'agreeable' it was to listen to my opinions, and how much more rapport was noticeable! My new girlfriend also refers to my voice as to one of my good qualities, which -- in combination with my other NLP techniques -- makes for my voice a seductive weapon of choice. I am recommending it to my friends. Thanks!
2004 - Chris ArellanoNorth CarolinaAttended Course : NLP Practitioner Training
Through this experience, I've gathered many things that I did not have before. I am able to see things, and see them from new perspectives. I have learned and am still learning how to improve both myself as well as those with whom I come in contact. Things I have just described are somewhat vague in description yet very profound to me. I owe much of this trance-formation to Jon for providing the tools and facilitating the use of these new tools in a positive direction. Thank you.
1998 - Chris FialaMarketing Consultant, Clearwater, FLAttended Course : Speaking Ingeniously
"I very much enjoyed your seminar. Having more comfort when I talk with people makes the rapport deeper. Even though my demo is only 90 seconds, I hold longer eye contact with more potential customers, building a sense of connection. Result? Sales of my juicer product increased 30%." -
- Andrew JoyPrincipal French Horn, Cologne Radio Orchestra, Cologne, GermanyBought Audio : Finding Your Irresistible Voice
Your CDs arrived safe and sound. I've listened to the first two and worked on the exercises. I'm a 55 year young, professional principal french horn player and have been working in a top German symphony orchestra for the past 30 years. I listened to the bonus telephone interview today. I am blown away. The results, applying your voice exercises to my playing (and to my students) are phenomenal. Resonance plays a huge role in performing on a brass instrument and very few poeple understand much about it. I've picked up useful and practical information, from singers and voice coaches, that I've been able to adapt to brass playing. Explaining resonance is now easy using your nose, mouth, throat etc, approach. The killer though, is using double resonance. I have free at present and don't have to perform in the orchestra (and the hall) until the beginning of Febuary. However, I am itching to hear how my changed sound is in our hall. It has to be amazing. Your material has added wonderfully valuable understandings to my comprehension of what constitutes excellent quality brass player and has beautifully simplified my means of effectively communicating it to my students. There has been a lot of belly laughter, stunned ears and broad smiles in my teaching studio this week. I'm teaching a course to amateur wind and brass players next year and am looking forward to applying your teachings to this particular situation for the benefit of the people attending. Thanks a million. This is one of the few times in my life where I've been gladly reeling and with a huge smile on my face.
http://www.andrewjoy.com2007 - Maureen StevensonCafe Manager, Nottingham, UKAttended Course : Belief Craft MP3 Set
"As a person who has never attended any NLP or KE Sessions before, I have found the whole experience useful to me and feel that I am going away with a wealth of knowledge I believe will guide me through many areas of my life. I am excited about attending more trainings in the future."
2005 - Howard WolfMiami, FLAttended Course : Persuasion Summit
PTPS was absolutely the best training in persuasion I've ever experienced. Chris' skills in NLP and persuasion are a compilation of the best of Richard Bandler, Kenrick Cleveland, & Michael Hall, all combined. Chris has evolved these techniques, enhanced them, and repackaged persuasion for the new millenium. Chris has tested his techniques thousands of times through the thousands of telemarketers he's managed over the years. This seminar will go down in the annuls of NLP history.
2001