NLP Belief Systems - NLP Chat transcript
IRC Chat Pages [ Back to Chat Index Page ]
IRC Chat Log, December 14, 1997
Getting Started | |
Jonathan | ALRIGHTY then... I believe we were going to talk about Belief Systems... And the question I wanna ask is... why should we do that? Because... they say that Why is an outdated question... that it doesn't help to ask why, and Budweiser agrees... but essentially... why is like a summary question. |
Designer | I'm not a total NLP expert, but I'll try to participate. |
Jonathan | So if we need to get more specific, we can do that! |
Jonathan | Belief Systems. What does it get us.... to evaluate the structure of belief systems? Answers? |
Designer | Why should we do that, as in, why should we talk about Belief Systems? |
Jonathan | ;) Lets get some ideas out on the floor! Alright... any answers? Guys... This is yes: "Yes!" This is no: "No!" This is Gee I dunno: "?" |
Designer | I believe ;-) it gives us a better understanding of the world we live in so that we're able to know how to achieve the things we want and learn to help those with us. |
dav0d | LOL |
Jonathan | Wow, all that eh? ;) |
Designer | heh |
Jonathan | Chunk down a bit, if you would... |
Doraemon | How about because Belief systems directly affect our lives, how we behave, and our capabilities... |
dav0d | I do it to see why i get defensive |
Jonathan | COOL answer, dav0d |
Designer | J-Alf, so we feel good? how's that? |
Jonathan | that's another good one! OK! now we're getting somewhere. I'm thinking more along the lines of self-improvement. |
Kay | mmm.... so *others* feel good? |
Jonathan | Ooooooh, Kay -- that IS a good one ;) As an, IS this a useful belief? For me (if its my belief) For others, if its someone else's belief. |
Designer | Kay: I would have it both ways. I believe in mutuality. |
Jonathan | Could that be helpful? |
Kay | mutuality. yes |
Jonathan | Hmmmm |
Designer | J-Altf: Can you expand on "this"? |
Kay | when I make someone -- uh, help someone feel good, I feel good too. |
Jonathan | so lets see what's next... how about... lets think about the ways in which NLP can help us to... evaluate and manipulate beliefs... (of course Designer ;) |
Designer | oop...he said the "m" word :-) |
Jonathan | Once we look at the structure of beliefs... we can determine if they're well formed. NLP teaches us things about how beliefs are structured, and whether we understand them in limited ways...! Manipulate is NOT a bad word. It comes with a negative stigma because its the INTENTION behind the manipulation which makes the difference. I give manipulation a REALLY GOOD name ;) ! So. |
Kay | oh, I think you do. |
Designer | J: In what way...my feeling is that some beliefs are completely rational and based on empirical evidence. How does NLP tell us if they're true? |
Jonathan | There are well-formed ness structures... Thanks Kay ;) So do you! |
Designer | J: Yes, you're truly right. Or not true |
PlayR | Truth! |
Jonathan | Designer... NLP allows us to ask questions around what constitutes a belief... |
Designer | re NLP |
Jonathan | and where that belief is held... and what it MEANS for us... |
Designer | I see |
Jonathan | so that we can determine if perhaps the belief is applicable in OTHER contexts... with other situations, but not present ones...! Lets keep this high level, and get into some specifics later because... |
Kay | we can find out that -- and I'm a newbie, remember -- we have beliefs that we don't believe in! |
Jonathan | Kay, how very accurate that is! |
PlayR | That's ZEN -- but I believe you. |
Jonathan | in 1-2 hours we can't (that's a firm belief) learn all about how to change beliefs in 10-15 different ways but we can very effectively explore the topics of how belief systems are made and how they can be re-evaluated, for better reasons! |
PlayR | I believe that. |
Doraemon | Ah... So lets get on with it. |
Jonathan | ;) PlayR! OK! Now. Let's start with an example. Doraemon, give me an example of something you believe in! |
Doraemon | Alright... I believe that I don't have too good a self-image... not a good believe but well... |
Jonathan | Well chosen (not effective for you, perhaps... but a good choice to work on)! Now. Let me ask some directed questions, if I may... |
Doraemon | Yup... :) |
Jonathan | would you mind? |
Doraemon | not at all.. |
Jonathan | ok So you told me what you believe you don't have. What do you believe you do have (in the same topic, just rephrase) |
Doraemon | I believe I have a ... bad self-image? |
Jonathan | ewwww |
Designer | lol sorry. |
Jonathan | ok I know you may HAVE HAD something like that, in your PAST... (easy reframe let me move on) -- (thanks for apologizing [to Doraemon], Designer, this is personal stuff here). So. Which sounds more appropriate to you: |
Designer | Doraemon: It was an oxymoron...I laugh at some people's deaths. Don't mind me. |
Doraemon | ... no offence taken... in any case, dun even know what lol is... |
Designer | Dora: It means "laughing out loud"...it's a word used loosely on IRC |
Jonathan | Would you like to (1) get rid of the BAD self-image? or (2) Get the TOO GOOD self image? Which gives you a more immediate match reaction? |
Doraemon | only two options?? |
Kay | What's the TOO GOOD self image? |
Jonathan | He said he believes he doesn't have too good a self image. Doraemon? |
Doraemon | Can I say that I am working towards having a GOOD SELF-IMAGE? |
Jonathan | (wanna get thru these initial q's quickly ;) YES, I like that one. OK. What would it do for you to have that? Let me BACK UP! ;) |
Doraemon | Makes me feel better abt myself... more confident of myself as well. |
Jonathan | OK. That gets it fine, actually.. so lets see... If you had a much better self-image, you'd feel better about yourself, and more confident.... |
Doraemon | yes... |
Jonathan | and what would that mean about you? Or what would that bring to you? Or... how would that change your behavior? |
Doraemon | I would socialize better... get better relationships, be more competent. |
Jonathan | kewl. |
Designer | yep |
Doraemon | thanks... |
Jonathan | sounds like a lot in life would improve in general. Sounds like your lot in life would improve in general. ;) Now. THAT is a well-formed belief. 3 parts. I'll get back to this. |
Doraemon | Sure.. |
Jonathan | Moving backwards to pick up a loose thread... Do you always have a poor self-image? Or just sometimes? |
Doraemon | Not always.... often though. |
Jonathan | Oh, so there *are* times when your self-image is REALLY GOOD. Even if they aren't all the time. |
Doraemon | yup... |
Jonathan | hmmm. Does this seem any more manageable yet? ;) |
Doraemon | a little perhaps... for now... :) could get better... |
Designer | My self image is great when I watch Jerry Springer. |
Jonathan | (little NLP joke) Anyway, leaving the mood lifter aside... ;) Designer OK. |
Designer | :-) |
Jonathan | So we have a contextual thing going on here... When do you feel best about yourself (choose one, b/c I suspect you could find quite a few.... & if you started to sort thru your past and look for things that made you feel AMAZING, didn't you then you might begin to feel even better now... ;) But moving forward, |
Doraemon | ... erm... when I feel that I can do things better than others... when I have a higher status... |
Jonathan | as you think about those things... of being of higher status & reaching higher states... What if you were to remember those states of status before you went into situations where in your past you might not have felt as good as you want to feel now? Do you think your behavior might change in those future circumstances? Think about those things... no need to answer... OK. |
Kay | oh, interesting , J |
Jonathan | Bringing the group back together here... Now. How many people here know about the famous Swish pattern? Y or N, from everyone plz |
Doraemon | me here... |
Kay | me, me, I know! |
Designer | Not I |
Doraemon | Y. |
Designer | Kay knows! |
Jonathan | ;) |
dav0d | n |
Jonathan | OK. Viktor? Erich? In any case, a quick description at a high level so we're on the same page: The Swish is a famous Compulsion Blowout NLP tool for eliminating compulsive behaviors. It has other uses. |
vk7 | Yes |
Designer | I think those two are in deep states |
Jonathan | The idea behind it is that the brain learns how to change, much better, very quickly. |
Designer | J: Very interesting |
Jonathan | So you take one picture of your compulsive behavior, and visualize a VERY rapid washout from the one picture into a MUCH more desired behavioral picture. |
dav0d | i agree |
Designer | J: Anything like "accelerated learning"? |
Jonathan | There's language patterns that help the process, and sound effects... |
Designer | ahh |
Jonathan | but anyway, you can do it 2-dimensionally, flat pictures held up in the air... OR... |
Designer | anchor collapsing |
Jonathan | there's something called the distance-based swish. |
Doraemon | Those are new terms coming in... |
Jonathan | Where you send the 1st picture off into the distance, so its tiny, and bring it up into the LOCATION of where you would normally place the BETTER behavior... |
Designer | cool |
Jonathan | Now, that's a lot of info. But you can use the latter type of tool, for CHANGING beliefs. No words. You just, take one belief that you KNOW is true... like the SUN is coming up tomorrow, and you find out where you place that picture in space. Get the brightness, the focus, the colors, the DETAILS (known as submodalities in NLP). WRITE THEM DOWN. THEN! you take a belief that you'd LIKE to believe is true but you know isn't... and you find out where that picture is.... in space around you... And then get the brightness, the focus, the colors, the submodalities of the less believed belief! |
Designer | That blends the emotions evoked by those two beliefs -- is that the purpose? |
Kay | ok... |
Jonathan | You can do a distance based swish... sending off the desired belief picture... and BRINGING that SAME PICTURE up into the LOCATION of the KNOWN belief, with the SUBMODALITIES SHIFTING into the submods of the KNOWN BELIEF! |
Doraemon | ... What happens to the submodalities when I have something that I believe is not true, yet would like it to be true? |
Designer | Oh, I'm not sure I understand yet...but keep talking, I'll get it sooner or later. :-) |
Jonathan | So the 2nd picture (desired belief) shows up in the location of the KNOWN belief, with the PICTURE CONTENT of the desired belief, but the PICTURE QUALITIES of the KNOWN BELIEF. It makes you believe the desired belief MORE. Sometimes, a LOT MORE. New stuff or old hat, Kay? |
Kay | both! :-) |
Doraemon | ... could I ask a question?? |
Jonathan | Give all that a try, folks. Take a minute or two. |
Kay | but if you take a belief and you make it really strong |
Jonathan | ;) yeaaaaaaaah |
Designer | And I thought it was the Vodka that made my parents believe I wasn't theirs. |
Kay | so you begin to act like it is true... |
Jonathan | mmm hmmmmmmmmmmmm (turning up the applause) ;) |
Kay | and I think what you believe comes true, but anyhow, you're acting like its true |
Jonathan | Milton Erickson pattern for inducing better behavior. |
Kay | then you ... maybe acting incongruently for what is actually thought to be true around you??? |
Jonathan | Act "as if". |
Designer | Kay: Is there limits to that in your view? Like what if you believed you were Elvis? |
Jonathan | Its only incongruent when you really don't believe it. |
Doraemon | And soon you won't |
Kay | Wot? I'm not? |
Designer | heh heh |
Jonathan | Guys, Elvis IS in the house. |
Kay | Ok. I believe that money comes to me in all different ways in abundant amounts! so I act that way. |
Designer | suuuure ;-) |
Jonathan | Me too! Thanks not to NLP, but to Stuart Wilde... ;) |
Kay | weird thing is, the money starts to act that way too. |
Jonathan | hehheh |
Kay | Oh, another Stuart Wilde fan!! |
Jonathan | S'funny Kay |
Designer | heh |
Kay | and the boss gives you a big bonus and says... I don't know why, you don't do any (huff huff) more work than anybody else here! he he |
Jonathan | I love it! Is this true? Or desired behavior? lol |
Designer | lol |
Jonathan | Nice ambiguity -- which class will you be taking? |
dav0d | desired |
Kay | Whatcha teaching? |
Jonathan | Let's move on to more interesting uses of this stuff. Beliefs. For this I'll defer to Robert Dilts. We have several logical levels of understanding. This is quite useful for determining well-formedness conditions. About logical levels. There is the SPIRITUAL self. The core. Around which is the human Identity. Around which is a set of beliefs. Around which is a set of abilities / capabilities. Around which is a set of Behaviors/Actions. Around which is the environment. |
Designer | In that order? |
Jonathan | Yes. The application of these ideas is extensive, but for the purposes of the belief... system... we look more towards where beliefs are directed. So. Doraemon, your belief was at what level? You can believe something about any level, including beliefs. |
Doraemon | Hmm... I think it is around the behavior level... |
Jonathan | Behavior level. Well, NOW it is ;) lol |
Kay | I'm a girl. |
Jonathan | But at first, where was it Kay's gender, like most of our own genders is usually associated with the Identity level. But I could be mind-reading, Kay might understand gender as purely a Behavioral level |
Kay | I'll never tell... |
Jonathan | And then she'd be ignoring her ABILITY as a female to give birth |
Designer | Jonathan, we don't want to know! (grin) |
Kay | lol |
Jonathan | Well, you wouldn't want to engender trust among the genders... |
Designer | Rapport? |
Kay | Actually, now that you've begged, I see my gender in the *spiritual* level.... But I know that when a belief that is less than useful for someone, one of the most effective ways of adjusting the belief is to move it to another level (or address it from another level). |
Designer | haha |
Jonathan | One way to do that is to give a counter example to the belief which shows that its not as widely-held a belief as they'd like you to think. Also, do that within yourself. If you believe you've ever had arguments with yourself in your head -- have you? By the way, have you ever? You have, have you not? |
dav0d | I do. |
Designer | Moi? |
Kay | Yes, I do. (& me too) |
I_am_Todd | Todd does. |
Jonathan | Some of those voices are male and some are female. |
Kay | Oh, alright, you're right. |
Designer | I don't argue with myself. You guys are crazy. :-) |
Jonathan | Why not increase the trust between them inside; it might increase the trust OUTSIDE |
Designer | Sorry, yes...I analyze two thoughts as if I believed them |
Jonathan | Talk about multiple personality, THIS order has got to stop |
dav0d | I'm trying... |
Kay | In ter esting thought... |
Jonathan | So by gently nudging beliefs you hear from yourself or from others into different logical levels, you get to determine how useful that belief is. Or how easily adjusted. |
Designer | Jonathan...I have a question for you...tell me if I'm interrupting |
Jonathan | you are interrupting and its kewl; this isn't a lecture ;) |
Designer | Ok! lol I don't want to interrupt...I would like you to continue please. :-) |
Jonathan | Oh, ONE INTERRUPTION by ME, actually, Would it be OK with everyone if I were to want to put this up on my website? Please say Y ;) |
Kay | y |
dav0d | sure :) |
Doraemon | .... Kay's... |
dav0d | right now? |
Designer | Jonathan: Do I get 50% profit? go ahead! ..let me interrupt you 1 sec. |
Jonathan | go ahead Designer |
Designer | Jonathan...was that "Please say Y" strategic? Did you think about saying that or was it just talk? |
Jonathan | Just talk ;) |
Designer | I'm curious because I'm into advertising, and....oh...just talk. :-) Ok. |
Jonathan | But if you're interested in the fact that its an anchor for continuing on with the mini-seminar, yes. |
Designer | Too bad...I was hoping it had to do with NLP... ;-) |
Jonathan | Of course it has to do with NLP. I believe a lot of this stuff is just AUTOMATIC now. |
Kay | Oh, please keep this going. |
Jonathan | So I do it ALL the time. |
Designer | Jonathan...right! So it was strategic..ok good |
Jonathan | But I do make it my business to give valuable information... ;) So I appreciate your response. Now... moving along... |
Designer | cool |
dav0d | OK, noted. |
Jonathan | we've talked about belief systems being integrated with logical levels and how if you're gentle, and you take your time, you can help nudge things into different levels... you'll literally SEE the person change (unless its yourself and there's no mirror around) shift their physiology as they re-integrate the adjustment in thinking. Its quite profound. |
dav0d | Yes |
Jonathan | You can use this in sales, in therapy, in relationships... in... any form of influence or friendship, or in personal change. Again, Its quite profound. |
Doraemon | Can we move from the what to the how? |
Jonathan | So. Submodality-based Distand-Swish Belief changes too... {"From the what to the how..."} give me an example of your question, if you would... And its time, after this question... |
Designer | It's time? (Time to what) |
Jonathan | Dora -- waiting on example of your question |
Doraemon | Sorrie I meant to say, how to shift the belief to different logical levels. And how to use it on others? |
Designer | J...I think he meant, how do you help nudge things into different levels |
Jonathan | ahhhhh OK. |
Doraemon | Designer... you got it! |
Designer | ;-) |
Jonathan | I'm patting Designer & Doraemon on their backs for good inter-communication & helping each other out ;) |
Designer | *high-five* |
Doraemon | *high-five* |
Jonathan | Let's take an example then. My relative calls me up and says, "I hate computers, whenever I get around them, they break!" |
Kay | Environment? |
Jonathan | I say, "what do they mean?" They say, "it means I'll never be able to work with computers or other electronic things." |
Doraemon | Abilities? |
Jonathan | Right... ;) |
dav0d | Belief |
Jonathan | (Feelings)+(CONDITIONS) ==means=> (RESULT) ==> IMPLIES ABILITIES. 3 parts (first part additive). Usually you just need [Conditions --> Result] ==> Implication, for a well-formed belief. |
dav0d | could you do another one? |
Jonathan | Well I'm not done yet... And its interesting, Dilts has actually mapped out where you can place/point to in the chain, depending on what specific Milton model violation you hear (Sorry, that was for the more experienced students in the group). What if I wanted to take Dad's belief up there, and change it so that it didn't presuppose limited beliefs forever... and only applied the belief to certain PAST circumstances? Think about that. How might I do that? |
Doraemon | Hmm.. Milton Violation = correct Meta?? |
dav0d | ok |
Jonathan | Sorry, my error --- ;) Milton Pattern |
Kay | well, they used to break...until he got a new machine. |
Doraemon | okie... :) |
Jonathan | Each Milton Pattern can be identified as implying something inaccurate about a belief |
Designer | Jonathan, tell us, inquiring minds want to know! |
Jonathan | specifically somewhere in the chain above |
dav0d | change the conditions |
Jonathan | I'm trying to SPARK some creative thought here, I don't know how to solve the damn belief that's why I got you all in here so I could work on my relative's belief ;) just kidding |
Designer | lol Jonathan |
dav0d | :) |
Doraemon | Jonathan, are you talking about timeline here when you talk about the chain? |
Designer | I would say change the feelings |
Jonathan | Sure, Doraemon, time's involved too. OK, Designer, but how specifically? |
dav0d | show your relative why the computers broke when he there... |
Designer | Jonathan... by collapsing anchors...by linking positive experiences with negative, and that would make the negative emotion associated with the conditions obsolete |
Jonathan | Time's involved b/c in the belief above, Dad thinks it applies in the future. SURE Designer! Anyone want Designer to define the words/terms he used? (just want to keep us all in similar pace) |
dav0d | yes |
Designer | For example You hate bowling because your past experiences have been that you lost repeatedly...every time you bowled and you feel inadequate...and you speak like "I always suck at this game" So If you had 1 positive experience |
Jonathan | Riiiiight |
Designer | (Or any unrelated experience that has a lot of positive emotion associated with it) |
Jonathan | It's enough to provide a counter-example to the "ALWAYS" part of the belief! |
dav0d | ahhh |
Kay | The unrelated experience is the powerful part! |
Jonathan | It then allows you to consider the possibility of more frequent success. |
Designer | You would mix them together, or have the more powerful experience overpower the other by techniques like thinking of both of them at the same time |
Jonathan | People need to simplify situations & facts & patterns A LOT. |
Designer | yep! |
Jonathan | Its quite a deep need -- its one of the 3 things we do when we modify our understandings of reality. We GENERALIZE. |
Designer | I hope that made sense, I'm not an NLP expert |
Kay | what are the 3 things? |
Jonathan | Kay you know this one, don't you? DISTORT, DELETE, & GENERALIZE. |
Kay | ok, I remember. Deletion, distortion, generalization |
Designer | Jonathan: That's the word! Generalization....racism/sexism... |
Jonathan | ;) Yep! I was nominalizing ;) LOL |
Designer | heh |
Kay | no wheelbarrow here |
Jonathan | Designer, who have you trained with? (lol Kay) Kay you make me laugh, and that's a firm belief |
Kay | Thanks, |
Jonathan | In fact, its all your fault I'm laughing, I take no responsibility for my own reaction ;) |
Designer | Jonathan: Just myself...I read a lot of either books or online material...learning from the experience of others |
Kay | I am ALL POWERFUL |
Jonathan | Wow, you're ripe for a training. Sorry to sound sales-ish, but you are ;) |
dav0d | In this case, you would point out to dad that in one case the computer did not break |
Kay | I think Designers doing great!! |
Jonathan | Yes, that's a good starting point |
Designer | Kay...thanks :-) |
dav0d | OK, thanks! |
Jonathan | that's a good very starting point but there's more you could do when was the last thing you remember |
Designer | Jonathan... lol, thanks...train me away |
Jonathan | Meanwhile, what else might I do with Dad... |
Doraemon | The "ALWAYS" Counter example |
dav0d | Also take him on a new field trip to the computer zoo to show him a positive experience? |
Jonathan | Yes, I'd walk him through a counter example perhaps, help him build a library of better experiences, eliminating the ALWAYS behaviorally... or, I'd take the ALWAYS, and turn it back around with emphasis.. as in... "ALLLLWAYS?????" |
dav0d | Yeah |
Kay | Gee, now I realize you gave us hints by the way you phrased the question. |
Jonathan | And they always go... well, not ALWAYS... |
Kay | right. |
Jonathan | which one, Kay? I mean, I do that a lot, but why not show everyone else what you noticed... |
Kay | Agggh. Have to think.... well, |
Jonathan | oy hate thinking. ;) |
Doraemon | They ALLLWWAAYSS go "well, not always." ?? |
Designer | hehe |
Jonathan | Good eye, Designer! |
Kay | the word "hate" |
Designer | Thinking hurts :-) |
Jonathan | You guys are starting to notice things more ;) |
Kay | very absolute. |
Doraemon | :) |
Kay | and whenever ... whenever = always ---->"every single time?" |
Doraemon | Can someone tell me something to say to an idiot who killed my connection that would give him a really bad day? |
Designer | Jonathan...I thought what you said about "act as if" earlier was interesting |
Jonathan | Yep ;) Sure. What you practice, Persists. |
Designer | Jonathan...in what circumstances do you do that, and how good does it work? |
Jonathan | If you don't believe you're beautiful, just act AS IF you are. You will be. |
Designer | Your body will change? |
Kay | That works!!! ;) |
Jonathan | Believe THAT, if you have to believe things that aren't NECESSARILY based in "truth" whatever that is. |
Designer | Or do you mean you will *believe* you are? haha Kay |
Jonathan | If you're looking for solutions, you'll find em, if you're looking for problems, you'll find those too. I choose the former. Designer, YES, your body will change. |
Kay | the former in the dell |
Doraemon | you gotta know the problems b4 you know what solutions to look for right? |
Designer | True. |
Jonathan | You won't drop 30 pounds overnight (if you even had that much to drop) but there ARE REAL, quantifiable physiological changes that occur. Get into the state, as fully as you can... that you believe you are beautiful. |
Designer | Jonathan...so your thinking is that the physical world answers to the mind? |
Jonathan | Doesn't need to be beautiful to EVERYONE. Just to you, and hopefully a few others. Its enough. |
Kay | I suspect the physical world answers to the Mind. |
Jonathan | yes, for the following reason: IN NLP, we say, the Map is not the territory. Right? Its one of the central NLP tenets. |
Kay | well, sometimes we argue about that... |
Jonathan | The Map is not the territory. |
Kay | but I agree... |
Jonathan | Our internal understanding is different than reality. ok. Well guess what,. What if we change the map, for the future... |
Kay | you got to put yr curlers in |
Designer | Jonathan...I haven't seen anyone become beautiful or change physiologically substantially...so are you saying this because you believe that there are many truths, or is it because you have experiences with people changing this way? |
Jonathan | The Territory... can BECOME the map... Designer, FULL Stop. What happens to people when they fall in love? |
Doraemon | heh? |
Jonathan | Ever watched someone fall in love overnight? |
Doraemon | Love at first sight? |
Jonathan | Sure. |
Designer | Sure |
Jonathan | Really? How did they change? People become more beautiful overnight. |
Kay | Designer... if people don't become beautiful by thought... |
Designer | Oh. I know what you mean, however, |
Jonathan | Their circulation improves. The skin tightens. The eyes brighten up. The lips thicken. The posture improves. The list goes ON and ON... |
Kay | its because they didn't believe they could, and didn't try. |
Designer | I'm not too sure about the belief that you can have a new leg if you had none before. |
Jonathan | Well, alright, but maybe modeling lizards would be useful in other contexts. I don't know... Are you so sure? |
dav0d | there are no absolute truths |
Jonathan | YES THANK YOU YES |
Designer | Jonathan...I have tried many times to |
Jonathan | there are no absolutes |
Kay | absolutely no absolute truths |
Designer | believe I could walk through a door and acted as if too...haha But my almost broken nose told me otherwise |
Jonathan | Got bruised, eh? |
dav0d | lol Kay |
Jonathan | OK, well fine on that note -- but take this for granted: If you got into the state where you believed you didn't need it as much as people who take it for granted feel that they need two legs... I guarantee you your body will have begun to compensate for it in lots of other ways. Also, don't ask silly questions (growing a new leg). ;) Ask questions like.... I wonder how quickly and naturally your balance and the strength of your other leg could begin to dramatically enhance their own capabilities... almost to the point where, no matter if you use one leg or two... you might... amaze people with your human potential.. making THEM jealous for not having experienced human challenge enough to have handled life in the beautiful way you'll have begun to think about it in that new way... |
dav0d | i watched a movie about a boy who rode a bicycle across country with one leg -- neato |
Doraemon | Here you asked an imbedded question, the presupposes that the person's balance and strength would increase. |
Jonathan | I did a LOT Doraemon ;) |
Doraemon | I noticed... care to explain? |
Jonathan | Conversational Postulates..., embeds... presups... time distortion, future pacing... logical level adjustments... reframes & outframes |
Doraemon | erm erm.... detailed explaination would be interesting... |
Jonathan | kinda too much to go into here, without staying on topic. |
erich | logical levels:EBCBIS |
dav0d | so those are just examples in a sense...you doing it to us? |
Kay | I'm impressed. |
Jonathan | Write those down, look em up in an NLP book ;) |
Designer | Jonathan, sure, you're right that you may obtain the ability to use the other leg more effectively...what I question however is the belief by many in this industry that you can do anything you believe in. I think it's false because there are absolutes...but I do see your point. |
Doraemon | Alright.... ask you those questions later.... :) |
Jonathan | Designer: Those folks who you say believe they can do absolutely anything: There's a qualifier attached which you left out: "IF there's enough time to find a way." I already know that if one leg is shorter than the other, I can grow it longer. |
Kay | People have done that |
Jonathan | I have to go to a hospital, have them incise my thigh, slice my bone, etc and slowly, PAINFULLY, keep the sliced surfaces close enough to grow towards each other but always adjusting the gap. Until I grow it long enough. Takes a couple of months of course. |
Designer | Jonathan, I really don't think that's true. I think we have limits as human beings, and there is such thing as supernatural...I have many experiences that I didn't bring about with my believing in it... Kay: grow a leg longer? |
vk7 | There is much better technology to grow legs, and other bones as well |
Jonathan | OK, I accept that your belief is useful for your frame of reference. |
Kay | Designer: Charles Fillmore... |
Jonathan | Great! lets stay on topic tho ;) Designer, you have a library of things you say you believed in fully, that didn't happen. |
erich | Designer:Super-NORMAL...everything is "natural" |
Designer | Kay: Now that I could understand...since it's not automatic, the mind could instruct the body to place more meat or alter the bones in that area. vk...lol |
Jonathan | We could go through all, or one, and find out what the limitations were; you're probably correct about most but I bet with some that I'd find some incongruity, or perhaps time limitations that weren't practical. |
Designer | erich: I stand corrected. |
Jonathan | The presup is that there are no unreasonable goals, just unreasonable time-frames. |
Designer | Jonathan, is that an NLP presupposition? |
Jonathan | Yes. |
Designer | Ok. |
Kay | It's one of my presups! |
Jonathan | Ahhh, good Kay! |
dav0d | Mine also :) |
Designer | I feel lonely...but that's OK. :-) |
Kay | I disagree that feeling lonely is ok |
Designer | Too many people believe they can do anything Kay...haha |
vk7 | The force is with you! |
erich | Kay:feeling *alone* is ok...lonely...well that's another story |
Designer | Kay: I'm kidding...I agree that it's not OK. Well, at least not to me. I think it's OK only if I was OK with it. If I wanted it |
Kay | I think feeling lonely is like feeling hungry... its a sign that you need to do something to *love* someone. |
Designer | Kay...sure |
Jonathan | Kay is giving a LOT of information away ;) |
Kay | So, when you're hungry, eat. Free. |
Jonathan | Well there's always more... but this is a good place to stop! Thanks for coming, folks! See you at the next one! |
IRC CHAT OVER! |
[ Back to Top ] [ Back to Chat Index Page ]