NLP Meta Model - Unpacking Deep Structure & more - NLP chat
IRC Chat Pages [ Back to Chat Index Page ]
IRC Chat Log, January 28, 1998
Introducing the Meta-Model, & good intentions for its use! | |
JonathanA | How's everyone doing tonight? |
TCX | Humor on, uptime state... |
JonathanA | I'd like to ask everyone to consider a few things as we go thru this chat... Specifically... how the Meta Model is used for wonderful results, and also how its misused sometimes. And maybe we can clear up a few phuzzy areas -- like when you hear things about how "the milton-model is the inverse of the meta-model" (which is only partly true). And generally start and end with the whole purpose to the process. Why DO we use the Meta-Model? What's it good for? What are some of its limitations? |
Renaissance | Details oriented...clarifying the map when it needs clarified. |
JonathanA | What secondary or tertiary results come from using it? Yes - & here's the thing. We all have a DEEP STRUCTURE of representing the world around us. And we communicate in less than perfect ways about what we've stored internally. Everyone agree about that? What we say to each other is the SURFACE STRUCTURE of our communication. |
Renaissance | yes, deletions, distortions and nominalizations. |
TCX | Sure, words just generalize |
JonathanA | What you HEAR, is SURFACE STRUCTURE. What you DONT, is DEEP STRUCTURE! So the Meta Model, in its simplicity, is designed to help you listen to Surface Structure, identify the real Deep Structure behind it, and provide a working model of your 'subject's internal Deep Structure. Here's the one place in NLP where its "appropriate" to be looking for whats not working in a person! The POINT of the Meta-Model is to find out their DEEP STRUCTURE deletions, distortions, and generalizations! Only once you've identified them, can you begin to linguistically work with them to provide your subject with NEW behavioral options, new behaviors, and new beliefs! GRANTED, by using swishes and other things you can also choose to do some of your work nonverbally, or metaphorically... but you're likely to be more effective if you're targeting their own self-taught impoverished understandings. So now lets go to an Example. And I'm wondering whether you'd all like to use a REAL example, or perhaps want me to 'make something up' |
Renaissance | can I be the guinea pig? |
JonathanA | Sure Renaissance ;) Is there something you want to discuss? ;) |
Renaissance | Ok, here's the deal...I tend to blush when I visualize sex. I think I got it whipped, but this will be helpful I'm sure too. |
JonathanA | You tend to blush, eh? When visualizing sex? |
Renaissance | Yes... |
JonathanA | My intent here, folks, and yours if you play with the Meta Model too, is to FIND OUT how he understands that statement. So I'll turn it around. So when you visualize sex, you tend to blush. Always? Or are there times when you visualize sex and you don't blush? |
Renaissance | When I'm with someone else. if I try to recreate the situation in my imagination to repeat it, it doesn't happen. |
JonathanA | Are there times when you visualize sex and another person is there, and your cheeks retain their normal coloration? |
Renaissance | I tend not to blush by myself very much....once in a while, a comedian will get me. |
Renaissance | when I'm around friends, it happens, but if it's all guys, very rarely. |
JonathanA | oh ok -- so now we're getting somewhere. When you're around 1 or more women, and you visualize sex, you blush. |
Renaissance | uh huh. sometimes that's alright, if their blushing too. |
JonathanA | I'm wondering if you've ever been around 1 or more women, and its cold out, so, you blush then too, not from visualizing sex |
Renaissance | that would be true. |
JonathanA | oh ok, so, blushing occurs from multiple kinds of stimuli, this isn't the only one that would do it. |
Renaissance | That's true. It's expected when it's cold outside. Everyone does it. |
JonathanA | How do you know exactly when to blush? |
Ollie | I always have a problem with questions like that |
Renaissance | well when you skin gets cold, it knows to blush so you don't get frostbite. wonderful thing, the human body is. |
JonathanA | Right but, we mean (I think ;) about when you're with a woman, and you visualize sex. ;) And another question -- how do you understand blushing? What happens inside, and what occurs to you during or after a blush? |
Renaissance | during...my face gets warm |
Renaissance | after....when I switch away from visualizing, it goes away by itself. |
JonathanA | What we're doing is PACING every element of Renaissance's Blushing experience as best we can |
Renaissance | and my face gets colder again. |
JonathanA | MetaModel is not about leading, its about PACING & building internal models about other people. So you visualize this act... ;) and you start to feel warm in the face? Any sounds in there? Any voices or moans & groans etc? |
Renaissance | Not that I can recall. There might be now that you suggested it. (oops...installed moan virus. ;) ) |
JonathanA | Well I'm leaving that suggestion right where it is -- decide for yourself ;) (big grin) |
JonathanA | noprob |
Renaissance | well, jon, to answer your question, if I did that, the problem would get worse. |
JonathanA | You mean the voices, right Renaissance? |
Renaissance | yes. |
JonathanA | ok -- what I'd like to ask now is why this is a problem? What happens that makes you think its a problem? |
Renaissance | it starts with a visualization. then my face gets warm. and it's happening right now, just talking about it. neat. :) |
JonathanA | I suspected as much -- thats good -- it means we're getting into this. |
Renaissance | well, in this case, it tends to not help rapport if I'm the only one blushing. |
JonathanA | (tom may be back later folks) |
Renaissance | I can work around it, but I prefer to work through it. |
JonathanA | ok, nicely worded ;) So essentially, to get this really clear, if you blush, it means it interferes with your social situations..? Notice I'm STILL not leading him anywhere, folks. |
Renaissance | it can, yes |
JonathanA | Does it ever lead to really cool results? (still not leading, I'm JUST asking!) |
Renaissance | ambiguity install... :) yes...wehn I'm rapport it's like stepping on the gas. |
JonathanA | not really an install. There wasn't any future pacing, or embedded commands. So sometimes this occurs when you're in rapport and sometimes it occurs when you're out of rapport, because, it just happens naturally in certain situations. |
Renaissance | yes |
JonathanA | So I'm finding out what happens in his experience as he went through this process, and what the semantic implications are of the process, when it happens, when it doesn't, what things might occur, what might not occur.... i.e. I'm getting all the parameters of the statement, and getting a valid frame around the issue. The Meta-Model tells me his Rep-System strategy for understanding the process as well. Everyone following here? |
Renaissance | this is interesting, because it gets harder and harder to answer. |
Morag | sort of |
JonathanA | Thats right, it gets more and more detailed. |
Dan_26 | strategy was the word i was waiting for :) |
JonathanA | You have to drill down deeper & deeper in order to complete the picture for me. Renaissance thank you for that. We can chat later to do some work with that. |
Ollie | Yes, I tend to find it hard to answer pretty much from the start :\ |
Morag | can you talk about rapport at this point? |
JonathanA | Everyone give him a hand |
Morag | clap |
Renaissance | that was fun. :) |
JonathanA | Yes -- thank you for bringing that subject up |
Dan_26 | ...is applauding |
Ollie | Jonathan, what if the subject has difficulty answering the questions? |
Renaissance | you're pretty tough with the model there, Jonathan... |
JonathanA | We'll get to that one Ollie! ;) OK: |
META MODEL & RAPPORT | |
Renaissance | it's important to stay in rapport when you do this...! :) |
JonathanA | Guess what folks, the Meta Model breaks Rapport ;) |
Ollie | OK. It's sort of an issue because someone was trying to meta-model me the other day and not getting very far because I couldn't answer the questions he was asking. |
JonathanA | It requires that the subject break rapport themselves, and do lots of deeper & deeper TDS's to answer your questions! TDS = TransDerivational Search |
Morag | k |
JonathanA | Ollie without further knowledge I suspect they didn't know what they were doing all that well, but I could be way off. OK. So the Meta Model breaks Rapport. And since it's Recursive (you can use the same kinds of questions again and again as you drill deeper and deeper into the details)... |
Renaissance | bulldogging the meta model... |
Ollie | Well, yeah, I think you're right about that... but I don't know how they could have done it to elicit the answers from me. |
JonathanA | It COULD be a never-ending search for a clearer picture with "accurate" details. So you have to "know or feel" when you've got enough info to work with, and stop before Rapport is lost or before you annoy or bore your friends/family/clients... Lemme relay a funny story that I heard on one of Dilt's videos! |
Ollie | Hehheh - also rapport wasn't there in the first place, which didn't help. |
Dan_26 | one would think that a person who primarily works out of a large chunk size would find this level of detail somewhat challening |
JonathanA | Dilts learned the Meta Model in the first 2-hr class of a Linguistics class he took, and that was on a Thursday. Well, they taught that before they taught Rapport, and by the 2nd class (the next Tuesday) everyone came in looking dejected because they all left the 1st class as meta-monsters, and had proceeded to alienate all their friends & family |
Morag | I am one of those friends who is annoyed. Any point in my auditing here? |
JonathanA | Dan who are you referring to? Morag? Please explain? |
Renaissance | lol! |
Dan_26 | no one specifically, just a relevant thought that popped into my mind i thought i'd share |
JonathanA | k. Morag? |
Dan_26 | (been digging into metmodels a lot lately) |
Morag | A new friend revealed himself as an NLPer. As a back track on recent time together I feel I was manipulated. |
JonathanA | ahhh. So were you interested in learning NLP before this occured? |
Dan_26 | would you feel better, morag, if you had been unconsciously manipulated by someone who didn't know what they were doing? |
JonathanA | Or are you here to understand what he was doing better? Summary: GET RAPPORT FIRST, MONITOR IT AS YOU PROCEED WITH META-MODEL USAGE, AND STOP BEFORE YOU LOSE RAPPORT! OR... GET RAPPORT FIRST, AND WORK TO MAINTAIN IT VERY CAREFULLY as you proceed! |
Morag | Had never heard Heard of NLP. But...Had a great time. Then as pulled NLP info off the net I suspected that the mannerism shared views we had in common were actually contrived on his part. |
JonathanA | Use lots of softeners, use a non-invasive voice, etc. Being challenging usually doesn't help. I see -- OK Morag. I can understand your point. |
Morag | Challenge is OK |
JonathanA | I've had that done with me, and I think when its elegant, then even in the face of disparate views I still feel in deep rapport. Ever feel in deep rapport with someone while you're agreeing to disagree? Its quite marvelous. Anyway, Enuf on Rapport. |
Morag | For example...I offer my cigs around brit style...not common in Canada..He did later in meal back. |
Renaissance | his purposes for doing that might have been noble. :) |
JonathanA | IN MY OPINION ;) NLP shouldn't be about being chameleons, it should be about understanding more about who YOU are, and understanding more about how other people are, and how to communicate the differences in an elegant, praise-ful and praise-worthy way! And yes, his purposes could have been noble. |
Morag | tentative k |
JonathanA | The best place to "try out new NLP skills" is in the Seminar room, because everyone knows what you're up to, and so there's no danger of ruining potential rapport situations, right? (agreed Morag, tentative) Morag felt something afterwards, in retrospect, that, (and of this I'm sure) his friend never wanted him to have felt. Whatever he did backfired to some degree, therefore... |
Ollie | I have a friend who tends to complain a lot if she thinks people's opinions aren't their own... if she thinks they're just picking up other people's opinions rather than thinking out their own... so if I disagree with her, and I feel rapport slipping away, I say: "I am allowed to have my own opinion, you know." |
JonathanA | Alright. So Rapport is important when using the MetaModel because it can be known to break/weaken rapport. Now! Moving on a little. Lets get to some cool stuff |
Ollie | OK |
How & Why Does It Actually Work? | |
JonathanA | Welcome Phoenix! |
Phoenix-1 | What did I miss? |
Renaissance | All the good stuff. :P |
JonathanA | We've gone thru a Meta-Model demo, its purpose, and the element of Rapport in relation to it... and now we're getting into detail. |
Phoenix-1 | ok, I'll go home :) |
JonathanA | without further ado... We do 3 things to create internal representations of our reality (our maps). Taking in all kinds of objective sensory data, we muss a lot of it up on the way in! What do we do guys? What 3 things do we do!? |
Dan_26 | generalize, delete, distort |
JonathanA | thaaaaank you! OK Lets take Deletion first! |
Phoenix-1 | im not here |
JonathanA | We do 4 things when our language indicates a deletion of some kind. Anyone know (without looking it up... ;) |
Renaissance | I'm not noticing Phoenix....even though he's here. |
JonathanA | Hah! |
Renaissance | leave something out. |
JonathanA | Leave something out... ;) true... that summarizes all of them... OK tell you what I'll go thru them and you can all give me examples! |
Phoenix-1 | filter |
JonathanA | (1) Simple Deletion - statement with missing or deficient info |
Renaissance | all statements do right? |
Ollie | I thought that was spot on, btw, what you said earlier, Jonathan :) |
JonathanA | Hah! Good examples! OK. (2) Comparative Deletion - Something thats a LOT more frequently seen |
orionben | It's more important... |
Ollie | Now you're making more sense... |
JonathanA | Something thats a LOT more frequently seen .... THAN WHAT? |
orionben | Comparative Deletions are definetely more important |
JonathanA | thaaaaats right! (3) Lack of Referential Index - And what you were saying earlier is absolutely right |
Phoenix-1 | according to whom |
JonathanA | So they say (grin!). (4) Unspecified Verb -- This one I leave as a challenging example. |
Ollie | Things aren't so good today, are they? (That's 2 for the price of 1) |
Renaissance | is that passive voice? |
JonathanA | Other good examples? |
Renaissance | the report was done. |
JonathanA | YES. |
Renaissance | engineering reports are all passive voice. |
Phoenix-1 | she was great :) |
JonathanA | Alright. So in encountering these 4 things, any one of you can find more value in looking for these sorts of deletions as part of the Meta-Model utilization. |
orionben | This is fun??? |
JonathanA | ;) OK! Moving on to DISTORTION! |
Phoenix-1 | wow how green the sky is |
Renaissance | she's big enough to {beep} in a dumptruck. |
JonathanA | ewwww |
Renaissance | lol...I know. ;) |
orionben | God, did you guys hear that? Phoenix thinks the sky is some weird pea color! |
JonathanA | (1) Nominalization - Its shoddy epistemology, but its an example! |
orionben | I love seduction! |
Phoenix-1 | i love u |
JonathanA | Examples of Nominalizations! |
Renaissance | is that your decision. |
Phoenix-1 | }kiss{ }kiss{ }kiss{ |
JonathanA | love as a verb is not a nominalization ;) but love as a concept is |
orionben | seduction is the nominalization! |
Renaissance | loving is the moveable version of love. |
Dan_26 | any noun you can't put in a wheelbarrel :) |
orionben | it's changing seducing into an event. |
Ollie | Love is blind |
JonathanA | OK More Distortion... |
Ollie | Times are hard |
Renaissance | love is like a box of chocolates. |
JonathanA | (2) Cause / Effect -- and if I give an example here it might cause you to think of others, |
Ollie | Or even life ;) |
JonathanA | (wait up guys) |
orionben | I think discussing these things causes us to learn NLP much faster now! |
JonathanA | If you jump ahead, you'll be without the rest of us |
Renaissance | and that's true for everyone because NLP delivers skills to improve all communication and relationships. |
JonathanA | If you hear "IF - THEN --" then its cause-effect. Thaaats right Renaissance! (3) Mind Reading - This one's cool, I know you guys will like this one |
Renaissance | I'm confident everyone will. |
JonathanA | And its really clear you meant something very different by that last example. |
Dan_26 | yea, i know what you mean |
Todd_B | I new you were gonna say that |
Ollie | Jonathan's been itching to tell us about this |
Phoenix-1 | i know your thoughts MOO HA HA HA |
JonathanA | hehheh |
Renaissance | jonathan, but of course because I want everyone to be gloriously happy. |
JonathanA | You guys are OUT OF CONTROL! I just know it! |
Phoenix-1 | SNARF |
Renaissance | I know we'd enjoy the opera together....honey. |
JonathanA | (4) Complex Equivalence - This one is a little different, thus Clinton's polls are rising. If I blush, it means they know I'm thinking about Sex! |
orionben | Look, complex equivalence just means that people can make one thing mean another... |
Renaissance | lol... |
Phoenix-1 | you did that because you dont love me |
Morag | his polls? |
Renaissance | blushing is bad. |
Ollie | I was here 10 minutes late, so I'm not really qualified to give an example here. |
Renaissance | but not always... :) |
JonathanA | OMIGOD Marsha, if I gain 5 pounds he'll never take me out to Dinner |
orionben | I think these means we understand CE. NEXT |
JonathanA | (4) Lost Performative - They always talk about this one first. And they say its a good one. |
Dan_26 | the examples sound similar to cause/effect |
orionben | They say this one is the most important. |
Ollie | Isn't CE like Cause/Effect, but in a difference tense? |
JonathanA | Deer are beautiful creatures! |
orionben | According to whom? |
JonathanA | A different sense, perhaps, not necessarily a different tense... ;) |
Dan_26 | "they say. . . . " |
JonathanA | Yes they are similar, but instead of their being Equal, one causes the other. One is the predicate or pre-cursor for the other. |
Phoenix-1 | Bambi tastes gooood |
Ollie | OK, I see the difference. |
Renaissance | a =b or a implies b. |
Dan_26 | metaphor (?) |
JonathanA | Right Renaissance! Dan, more a simile than a metaphor, if poetic jargon is your thing ;) -- a IS b, not (a is like b) |
Dan_26 | ok, have to review that one a little more |
JonathanA | alright.... |
Ollie | That is a metaphor, then |
Phoenix-1 | logic not= meta-model |
JonathanA | MOVING ON to Generalization |
Ollie | (a is like b is a simile) |
Phoenix-1 | ALL WAYS |
JonathanA | I always enjoy this one |
Renaissance | gotcha...ok. women are all beautiful. |
Todd_B | so is that a distortion, or are we already to generalizations? |
JonathanA | And you HAVE TO listen carefully, because if you don't you'll never get it and once you've already gotten it you'll definitely never want for more learning anymore! |
Ollie | I'm never gonna get the hang of this |
JonathanA | (1) Universal Quantifiers! |
Phoenix-1 | YOU ARE ALL CRAZY |
JonathanA | Always/Never, All/None |
Renaissance | wait!....isn't a distortion and a generality the same? |
Questor_ | I always hate it when my wife uses those. :) |
Renaissance | subclass one of the other? |
Phoenix-1 | you are always all crazy you never have none of that |
orionben | no, You're ALL crazy! |
JonathanA | (2) Modal Operators of Necessity/Possibility -- I just CAN'T go on here... {grin} |
orionben | It's not necessary to understand this one... |
Ollie | You must think we're crazy |
Renaissance | you will never understand me. Nope..that one doesn't count, really. |
JonathanA | (3) Presuppositions |
Ollie | You just don't understand me |
Renaissance | you think I'm fat. (i hate that one.) |
JonathanA | This one is a little trickier and after you've enjoyed going through some examples , then we'll move on |
Phoenix-1 | you CAN do that |
JonathanA | Renaissance Mind-Reading ;) |
Ollie | I'm ugly |
Renaissance | it was...wasn't it...ooops. |
JonathanA | Presuppositions are a lot sneakier than most of these examples, though they're a great start. The presups are usually in the deep structure and rarely make it out into the open ;) |
Phoenix-1 | I suppose that is true |
Ollie | no, that's a, erm, whatever it was called... "who says I'm ugly"... wasn't it? what are those called? again? |
Renaissance | phoenix...good example. according to whom? |
JonathanA | When presups come out, its like groundhog day, I reach for the mallet. {ploink!} |
Phoenix-1 | playing "caddyshack" music |
JonathanA | A double-bind is a complex combination of presuppositions, for those who know the pattern. |
orionben | Well, I don't know how naturally you can discover all the presuppositions in this sentece, but having done that, maybe you'll be surprised to sigh that sigh of relief... |
JonathanA | (but by & large I'd like to stay away from the Milton stuff here tonight) |
Ollie | You're not going to believe this... |
JonathanA | YES Ollie! Good one! |
Ollie | but I think I've got it! |
Renaissance | as you listen to my voice, and ponder these words... |
Phoenix-1 | I have a intuition about you |
Renaissance | ok...now I got it clicked. |
JonathanA | I was thinking at first it was mind-reading only, and it is Mind-reading, but you're presupposing the response! |
Phoenix-1 | have you ever... |
JonathanA | Yes |
Renaissance | morag...pay attention here...presupps are fun to flirt with. |
Morag | k |
Renaissance | should I cal you in the morning, or nudge you. |
META MODEL SPECIFICS DONE | |
Renaissance | see? |
JonathanA | So we've covered a lot! |
Ollie | Would you like it Tuesday, or Thursday? |
JonathanA | We covered the intent of using the MetaModel to learn more about deep structure, and we covered the issue about losing rapport if you're not conscientious as you use it, and we covered the specifics of the Meta Model. So! |
Renaissance | gotta run for a few... |
JonathanA | We're pretty close to done here! |
Morag | bye and thank you |
JonathanA | I thought now that we've gone thru all that, we could let Phoenix use the Meta Model on someone else's issue! |
orionben | What sort of issue? |
JonathanA | You name it! |
orionben | Well. I'm sick. |
JonathanA | Sick of what? ;) |
Phoenix-1 | hey!!! |
orionben | That's probably not a good one though. I mean I've got the flu |
Ollie | Could we do mine after orionben's, since it's already been *un*successfully metamodelled and I'd like to see how it should be done? |
Phoenix-1 | just a minute here - OK Who's 1st |
Ollie | Ben? You wanna go 1st? |
orionben | Sure. |
Ollie | OK. Bags I 2nd, then. |
JonathanA | Orionben will present an issue! |
Phoenix-1 | OK What's up (my main meta-model Q) |
JonathanA | ;) |
orionben | Well. Ive got the flu. AND I've got to train this weekend... |
Phoenix-1 | How do... well, you HAD the flu... and How do know you had a flu |
orionben | WEll, um... |
Phoenix-1 | thats right :) |
orionben | I've had a very runny nose, aches, and felt yucky. I hate 'fluing' |
Renaissance | once you've had it once...then it's everyone elses turn for a while. :) |
Phoenix-1 | so that HAD happened, what is going to happen next? Renaissance: careful with your installations they could come back 10 fold |
JonathanA | ewwww |
orionben | Well, I started taking some killer anti-Bees so I think I'm gonna get heathy soon, I hope |
Renaissance | ooops...didn't want o make everyone sick...hehe... |
Phoenix-1 | hmmm, have you gotten wellbefore |
Dan_26 | what would it be like, now, after you've gotten better and you're looking back at yourself now having made that change as you think about it now? |
orionben | Oh yes. I have gotten well before! |
Phoenix-1 | and have you ever felt bad and then felt good for no reason |
orionben | I have indeed feel bad and then felt good for no reason |
Phoenix-1 | ALL WAYS :) and have you ever realized a thought you never thought before, now |
orionben | Yes. |
Phoenix-1 | and knowing that can you now feel a new feeling |
orionben | That's certainly possible... |
Dan_26 | you have no reason to feel good now. . . |
orionben | Thanks a lot DAN! |
Renaissance | if you were to act as if that were happening, what other options would open up you could enjoy? |
TCX | Those are tough ones. Hard to realize a feeling or thought you never had |
orionben | I personally think I have LOTS of reasons to feel good now! I just don't... |
Phoenix-1 | Renaissance: hold on the embedded commands |
orionben | Now I'm really befuddled.... |
Dan_26 | maybe you should think about no reason for feeling good, i mean if it's worked before |
Phoenix-1 | good |
Renaissance | dan...:) |
Phoenix-1 | DAn_26: hold on I'm DOING this session, too many NLPERs spoil the model |
orionben | That is sooo true! |
Renaissance | sorry...didn't realize. |
Dan_26 | oops, sorry, rewind and erase that now |
JonathanA | Yes Phoenix, ID for everyone where you are in this -- still eliciting the deep structure of the illness description? |
Phoenix-1 | Jon: AFTER i'M done |
JonathanA | kewl! |
orionben | That's right. Now... |
Phoenix-1 | NOW: Orien, you HaVE felt good before, you HAVE felt bad then good, and you have thought a thought you nevr had before. correct |
orionben | that's right. Hmmm... |
Phoenix-1 | Now, Imagine for a moment going on that you are going to do all of them in the next moment . Where do u 1st feel the feeling of all of those at once |
orionben | Umm wait a moment... processing... in my throat. |
Phoenix-1 | and this is a postive feeling |
orionben | No. It's not a positive feeling |
Phoenix-1 | OK Get the feeling you get when you combine the 3 feelings I discussed earlier |
orionben | OK. It kind of sucks. |
Phoenix-1 | hmm it sucks to FEEL GOOD, BAD TO GOOD, UNKNOWN ?? |
orionben | Well, it does suck. And I think it sucks becase I'm sick. I don't have a lot of good feelings in my body right now, I'm sorry to say... |
Phoenix-1 | STOP! Where do you DO feel good in your body |
orionben | Sorry, missed that last comment - I feel good, lets see... - It's elusive... - My midsection feels good. |
JonathanA | cool! |
Renaissance | where do you DO feel good...I loved that one. |
orionben | I missed that one! |
Renaissance | your nose.....your unconscious knows picked it up. |
orionben | No, I've had too much of that already! Runny nose and all... |
Ollie | Jonathan - because I know a bit about NLP, I tend to notice things like the embedded commands Phoenix was using. If I notice it does that mean it's not going to work so well? (when it's being done with me, I mean) |
orionben | It's kind of like that scene in Indiana Jones where she finds one place that feels good and then kisses him there... There aren's arent' a lot of good places... |
Phoenix-1 | thats not the point, but HOW do you know that the good feeling doesnt SPREAD to the rest of your body, and How do you KNOW that you mind isnt doing process that are affecting that other process so that now the process is processessing properly. |
orionben | MMMMmmm ahhhhh and then the bad feelings start to spread again... hmmm |
Phoenix-1 | well thats ok because the bad feelings end. AND the good feelings continue to spread, dont they :) |
orionben | well, they do continue to spread... Unfortunatly, being as how the bad feelings still are kicking around, I don't exactly feel like a million bucks... However, this has been helpful.. |
JonathanA | ok AWESOME adjustment in modal operators here - one notch at a time. |
Phoenix-1 | orion: well I understand that used to be the way your body felt AND you can let your mind go...into the healed place |
JonathanA | We're getting close to the 2 hour mark. Do we want to go for 1 more example or close now? everyone vote... |
Phoenix-1 | Jon: got for it |
Renaissance, phosgene, TCX | yes! |
Phoenix-1 | is this useful to anyone? |
Ollie | Yes - since the example is me :) |
Renaissance | i'm learning a LOT! |
JonathanA | ok Ollie lets recap your issue |
orionben | Sure. It's just that... (limitation) The usenet is not the best place to actually use NLP skills to get real results... |
Phoenix-1 | I'll be right back nature calls |
Ollie | All right - well I haven't said what it is yet so here goes |
JonathanA | I agree |
Phoenix-1 | no I am missing at least 12 levels I'd use on you here |
JonathanA | thats why I'm not going into the Milton Model and any interventions here |
phosgene | has anyone ever hypnotized someone via computer? |
orionben | I'm VERY aware of that Phoenix! We're at communication bandwidthe like .01% |
JonathanA | phosgene -- stay on topic plz -- until after the scheduled chat is over |
Ollie | RU going to be doing one of these on the Milton Model in the future? |
orionben | hell yeah! Hypnotising computers can be fun! |
JonathanA | Sure I will, Ollie |
Renaissance | every steamy story you find on the internet could easily alter your state, could it not? |
JonathanA | Ollie? |
Ollie | K. I don't really know anything about that atm, so that'll be good. |
JonathanA | you have the floor |
Ollie | Yes? OK. Well, I'm in a long-distance relationship atm |
Phoenix-1 | Was up (varition on 1st meta-ques)? Oh! Congrats! |
JonathanA | yeah! |
Ollie | & because of the distance, it seems as though it's always either too much or too little |
JonathanA | No reframing or reblaming guys ;) Too much or too little what, specifically? |
Ollie | I mean, when we're together it's always several days at a time, without any breaks, which means the emotions can get really intense! I'm finding the intensity difficult to cope with. |
JonathanA | riiight |
Ollie | I mean there are practical ways of making it more manageable, which we've been thinking about, but still there's going to be this problem of over-intensity at times, I think. I've been very emotionally repressed for a very long time & only sorted that out shortly before I met her |
JonathanA | So you've had this problem of over-intensity in recent get-togethers eh? |
Ollie | so my emotions feel a bit fragile atm. |
JonathanA | ok. |
Ollie | Yes. |
JonathanA | What I'd like to ask is, when you're apart, do you feel like you reallllly want to be together like crazy? |
Ollie | The last time she was here, it got reeeally intense. Well... we've really only had one absence of more than a few days (it's quite a new relationship) |
JonathanA | k |
Ollie | at first, the main feeling was a release from the intensity of the previous few days |
JonathanA | How long did that take to dissipate? |
Ollie | then I really wanted to see her again - a few days |
JonathanA | How much down time did you feel you needed? before the desire crept back up? lets see... So it took a few days eh? And then you wanted to see her again? |
Ollie | I mean, if it were possible for us just to see each other like in a normal relationship, i.e., usually a few hours at a time, occasionally maybe a full day, and probably 2-4 times a week... that would be fine. |
JonathanA | What is a normal relationship to you? What does it mean, what does it provide for you? What do you provide for her in that definition? |
Ollie | A "normal" relationship, well, what I meant by that was what I just described. |
JonathanA | k, and the other questions there? |
Ollie | What does it provide for me? Erm, I'll take that as "what would I ideally like out of a relationship", k? |
JonathanA | sure |
Ollie | At this stage - about a month in - everything that I would want out of a friendship, *plus*... Hmmm... that's a difficult question... I'll explain why: I keep wanting to answer it in terms of "what do I want the other person to give me..." |
JonathanA | I understand, I think. |
Ollie | which I'm fairly open about... but really the main thing I think is the pleasure I get from being with them, without them having to do anything |
JonathanA | And thats how you'd have to answer it really, if you think about it. In a different way, though, a number of possibilities may open up. OK The pleasure. Now. What about down time? What do you value about your down time away from her? Your independence? |
Ollie | Yes, certainly |
JonathanA | How much per day? specifically? Lets pick up the pace here. |
Ollie | what, how much do I value it or how much of it do I want per day, or something else? |
JonathanA | How much down time do you need specifically, per day, to feel comfortable and in balance? I've been looking for whats "not being said" mostly in what Ollie is describing. He used a bunch of nominalizations at first, Modal Operators and Universal Quantifiers, which can all be looked at individually to show that there's likely somewhat more balance in his experience than he's willing to admit. |
Ollie | OK - I would say - per week - maybe 3-4 days when I can decide entirely for myself what to do... per day, on a day when I'm seeing her... most of the time I'd just like to see her in the evening... maybe a full day or half-day every 2 weeks or so. Well... half-day one week, full day next week, let's say. |
JonathanA | Ahhhah! ;) So that's your idea of an ideal relationship? I'm not judging anything here, just trying to make sure I understand you! At this stage, right? |
Ollie | At this early stage in the relationship, yes. In particular... I'd like fairly clearly defined "dates". i.e., the evening comes to an end and the date is over. |
JonathanA | Well, most folks don't know what their partner's idea of an ideal situation is at any similar stages, and they often feel uncomfortable broaching the subject, so... guess what... The difference between what is wanted and what IS, could grow out of proportion. So is any of this news to you? |
Ollie | What? You think I should broach the subject? I already have. |
JonathanA | I'd be surprised if you didn't! |
Ollie | The problems aren't caused by a difference in what I want and what she wants... |
JonathanA | Everyone here might, as you apply each element of the Meta-Model to what we're hearing here, discover things in what Ollie was saying that showed he was distorting or deleting or generalizing a lot. |
Ollie | it's a difference between what I want (because it's me who has a problem with it) and what seems to be unavoidable because of the distance between us. |
JonathanA | Now. His experience is NO LESS VALID for him, even if wellformedness principles don't apply yet gracefully to his relationship strategies... |
TCX | y |
JonathanA | so our intent with the MetaModel would just be to help us to understand his DEEP STRUCTURE more readily, and perhaps to help him to clarify his own situation more, and more freely without some of the deletions, distortions and generalizations that appeared in the initial language used with us. Make sense here? |
Ollie | i.e., it's not practical to visit each other just for a day - particularly not for an evening, because the trains don't run late enough... |
JonathanA | Granted I'm not leading with this example for now, but I suspect that just by talking it out with some of these kinds of questions, that Ollie may have even a SLIGHTLY better handle on what he's facing. |
Ollie | & it's not financially viable to visit for a few days & not stay with each other. |
JonathanA | I agree Ollie, the situation has pros and cons! Ollie -- without having done any real leading here, do you feel like you understand the situation any better than before we started talking about it? |
Ollie | But these are practical problems I'm talking about now. I'm not sure... I mean we've discovered a bit about the difference between what IS and what I would like... |
JonathanA | I agree they're practically problems. ;) |
Ollie | but what I would like isn't practical... & I don't really see how that helps me to cope with what is. |
JonathanA | It does seem like you're focusing on what's not working in the relationship, tho! Is that true? |
Phoenix-1 | ahhh this is never about practical only what works |
JonathanA | Are you deleting what's wonderful about the time you DO spend together? Or about how much you appreciate the time you DO have to yourself? |
Ollie | Well, I have been here, because that's the part of it that's causing the problem. Sure, there are good times - in both those categories. |
JonathanA | oh ok cool. So what is causing the solution? |
Ollie | What is the solution? The solution is being able to cope with the bad times. |
JonathanA | Cool. |
Ollie | No, that's not quite what I meant. |
JonathanA | hehheh - Are U sure? ;) |
Ollie | If I could cope with them, they wouldn't be bad. |
JonathanA | And, are there other solutions? |
Ollie | The solution is being able to cope with the emotion. I see two ways to cause this: 1) reduce the emotion to a more manageable (less intense) level - & this means either taking practical steps which will certainly help but can only go so far; or somehow managing to love her less... which isn't a solution I want |
JonathanA | #2? |
Ollie | 2) increase my capacity for coping with a lot of emotion |
JonathanA | How about 3) Recognize the goodness present with the badness you mentioned. Is it all black and white or are there lots of shades of grey? |
Phoenix-1 | Or silver! |
orionben | Thanks a lot for doing this, Jonathan! |
TCX | Yea, thanks Jon |
JonathanA | My pleasure. Thank you for coming tonight -- we had a LOT of great things to cover and I'd like to get closure for the group on what we did rather fully get through! I had a lot of fun and I hope you did too. |
Renaissance | thanx jonathan and phoenix...this has been a blast. |
Phoenix-1 | You're very welcome! |
IRC CHAT OVER! |
[ Back to Top ] [ Back to Chat Index Page ]